Palmlix.com’s Thieving Owner also owns A-GC.com

A while back I did a post titled More on Image Thieves: Palmlix.com Wallpaper site because of the difficulties that I was having trying to get the owner; one Muhammad Farhan, to remove images of mine that he had stolen then placed on his w a l l p a p e r site for free download without my permission, consent or authorization.

After that article was written Muhammad Farah used a service to hide his contact information called domainsbyproxy.com, but I contacted them and this email series is the result of that exchange (read from bottom up for chronological order):

Dear Mia McPherson,

As we have not received proof that our customer attempted to contact you, we are disclosing our customer’s non-public contact information for the limited purpose of this complaint. We will not cancel our proxy service unless the registrar advises us that they are in receipt of a pending UDRP dispute or lawsuit.

Registrant Contact Information (identical for both domains):
Paul Davidson
Address removed because Paul Davidson is listing a mailing address that does not belong to him, the owners of the home are distressed that he has not updated his mailing address
PH:+44.07796225022
paul@splodgemarketing.com

Please be advised that this information was provided by the customer. As such, Domains By Proxy cannot guarantee its accuracy. If any of the information proves to be invalid, please let us know and we will take steps to request updated information from our customer.

Please let us know if you have any questions or concerns.

Very truly yours,

L. Villeneuve
Office of the General Manager
Domains By Proxy, LLC

——– Original Message ——–
Subject: Re: PALMLIX.COM::627300
From: Mia <>
Date: Fri, March 01, 2013 5:20 am
To: generalmanager@domainsbyproxy.com

Your client did not contact me within the time period you specified nor did they remove the images from their web site that they have stolen from me. I request that you disclose the registrant’s contact information.

This person is using your services to hide from the people who have complaints about his illegal use of our images and his copyright violations which is in violation of your terms of service.

Mia McPherson

Bird, Nature and Wildlife Photography
OnTheWingPhotography

On 2/21/2013 10:00 AM, generalmanager@domainsbyproxy.com wrote:
>
> Dear Mia McPherson,
>
> Thank you for your message concerning the domain name PALMLIX.COM.
>
> Domains By Proxy (“DBP”) provides a proxy registration service that allows its customers to register domain names without listing their contact information in the public WHOIS database. Since DBP is listed as the registrant of all domain names for which it provides service, it may appear that DBP operates or has an interest in the domain name or website. That is not the case; DBP is neither a domain name registrar, nor a hosting provider.
>
> We have forwarded your complaint via email to our customer. In this email we requested that our customer contact you no later than close of business on February 28, 2013. If our customer fails to respond to our request, we may then disclose the registrant’s contact information.
>
> As Domains By Proxy does not have the ability to remove content from any website for which we provide our proxy service, you will need to contact the hosting provider. Generally the operators of the DNS name servers and the hosting providers are the same. For your convenience, we have listed the hosting provider below. Please note this is the information from the DNS records:
>
> CloudFlare, Inc.
> abuse@cloudflare.com
>
> Please let us know if you have any questions or concerns.
>
> Very truly yours,
>
> Jeffrey Renoir
> Office of the General Manager
> Domains By Proxy, LLC

I have dealt with CloudFlare.com repeatedly about the owner of this site and find it a waste of my time to contact them, I still have never had a reply from the hosting providers that they have given me. I believe a complete whois should always be made available even when people are using a cloud service that lists the hosting provider. It is a misnomer to say a cloud service is a hosting provider when no files are stored on their servers and it is just a pass through service.

Note that the contact information provided to me by domainsbyproxy.com does not match the whois information of the screen shot I created for Palmlix.com prior to Muhammad Farhan using their services:

palmlix-whois

In case you are wondering why I am writing about Palmlix.com again I came across a referral to my site today from a post titled “Good wallpaper bad wallpaper” on http://eddyandreuben.blogspot.com that mentioned the issues I had been having with the thieving owner of Palmlix.com.

I had not checked the site in some time because I have been extremely busy but after reading the post I went on a search for my stolen images on Palmlix.com and found that all of my images were removed, the pages either go to a generic IE error page or to a “404. Whoppppss NOT FOUND :( ” page on the site itself.

However; in my search I found another site using some of the same images stolen by Muhammad Farhan, who had changed the files names on my images to names which always included “mia-mcpherson39s”. That site is A-GC.com and when I did a whois to find out who owned the site this is the result I found:

a-gc.com-whois

Note that the Administrative contact and Registrant are exactly the same for the whois on Palmlix.com and A-GC.com

Registrant:
arkana
maguwo
bantul, Yogyakarta 55198
ID

Administrative Contact:
dzifa, shofa mbah_sastro07@yahoo.com
arkana
maguwo
bantul, Yogyakarta 55198

This person, whether they are Muhammad Farhan as he claimed in his first email to me or if he is dzifa, shofa, or the name Paul Davidson given to me by domainsbyproxy.com this person knows full well he has stolen my images and used them illegally on Palmlix.com and now he has several of my images on his other scraper site, A-GC.com.

a-gc.com-stolen-owl-image-mia-mcpherson

This image is mine, it even shows my name in the file name and it was one that this thief had used before on Palmlix.com and was removed the first time I wrote to Muhammad Farhan due to his infringements.

burrowing-owl-copyright

This is a close up of the “downloadable” version stored on the A-GC.com website ILLEGALLY. It says my name, it lists my web site so the ignorant statement on Palmlix.com of:

All wallpapers and backgrounds found here are believed to be in the “public domain”. All of the images displayed are of unknown origin. We do not intend to infringe any legitimate intellectual right, artistic rights or copyright.

Is quite frankly a load of Horse Manure. My images are not “Public Domain” he knew where he got them and as such purposely infringed on my rights.

And on his other scraper site A-GC.com disclaimer:

Please do not ask for permissions to use these images in your projects, as we do not own the copyrights for them. All images displayed on the site are provided only for personal use as w a l l p a p e r on computers, cell phones and other personal electronic devices. In case of an error where you are the owner of an image and feel it is used unknowingly, please contact us so we can immediately remove it from our website. We do not intend to display any copyright protected images. a-gc.com is an online service provider as defined in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. We provide legal copyright owners with the ability to self-publish on the internet by uploading, storing and displaying various media utilizing our services. We do not monitor, screen or otherwise review the media which is uploaded to our servers by users of the service. We assume copyright violation very seriously and will vigorously protect the rights of legal copyright owners. If you are the copyright owner of content which appears on the a-gc.com website and you did not authorize the use of the content you must notify a-gc.com in writing in order for us to identify the allegedly infringing content and take action. For any problems or questions please email to: mbah_sastro07@yahoo.com

Color emphasis is mine to make points about those statements.

Muhammad Farhan admits that they do not own the copyrights (for these images) – Yet he used MINE again even though this infringement crap has been going on since November of 2012.

feel it is used unknowingly - Muhammad Farhan KNOWS he has used my images KNOWINGLY and he knows he is using the rest of the images knowingly too.

We do not intend to display any copyright protected images. a-gc.com is an online service provider as defined in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. - They do use the images on this site without the authorization of the copyright owner and they do not give a damn about the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

We assume copyright violation very seriously and will vigorously protect the rights of legal copyright owners. – Vigorously?? That is freaking laughable, they are doing quite a lot of vigorous THEFT. Protect?? What a stupid statement when NONE of the images on Palmlix.com or A-GC.com belong to Muhammad Farhan.

All images displayed on the site are provided only for personal use as w a l l p a p e r on computers, cell phones and other personal electronic devices. – Muhammad Farhan does not have my permission or authorization to OFFER any of my images for download for ANY reason or device. It is an infringement of my copyrights, it is THEFT.

And this statement: We provide legal copyright owners with the ability to self-publish on the internet by uploading, storing and displaying various media utilizing our services.

This is patently false. There isn’t a place ON A-GC.com to register to self-publish, upload, store or display images. This is just crap put on the site to mislead people into thinking that the legitimate owners of all the stolen images have uploaded them to this server themselves and it is a damn lie.

This is theft, pure and simple. Below are two more of my stolen images that are being used without my permission on A-GC.com

a-gc.com-stolen-pelican-image-mia-mcpherson

a-gc.com-stolen-se-owl-image-mia-mcpherson

I have had several people email me asking for this thief’s contact information because he has used their images without permission and that is why I felt it was important to write yet another post about copyright infringement on Palmlix.com and now A-GC.com so that the owners of images used without permission on these two scraper sites will have the information I have about this copyright offender.

Administrative Contact:
dzifa, shofa mbah_sastro07@yahoo.com

When I find out who the original hosting provider is I will post that information too on every post I have mentioned Muhammad Farhan, Palmlix.com and A-GC.com in.

I have added a WordPress plugin called “iQ Block Country” to block Indonesia which is where Yogyakarta is located to prevent this infringer from gaining access to my images, the images he has currently posted on A-GC.com he had downloaded before and must have stored on his computer.

I will pursue every legal step I can to get my images removed from A-GC.com.

In case you hadn’t noticed, scraper sites like these tick me off. Our images are copyrighted the moment we take them and they are not to be used without our permission or authorization. This is theft. This is copyright infringement.

This thief is making money through advertisements on those sites and the ONLY reason people visit them is for the images, that is money that he does not deserve because he does NOT own our images.

And that is disgusting.

Mia

Facebook Twitter

Standing up against Google’s new Image Search and the copyright issues involved – Class action lawsuit

No photo for this post but it is important to any one who photographs and posts their images to the web. It is important to artists and  graphic designers.

Please feel free to pass on the link to anyone you know who is a photographer or an artist.

Since Google made changes to its Image Search on January 25th many photographers and artists have voiced complaints about the drop in visitors to their sites, for those that have ads they have had a drop in income from those ads and one of the other complaints is about Google hot linking to the full sized version of the images which allows infringers to easily illegally download those images to their computers.

I have written two posts about the changes Google made to their Image Search and many other photographers/webmasters have too because Google has over-stepped with their new UI.

Is Google’s New Image Search Violating Their Own Policies? The Law?

Google needs to remove the hotlinks on Image Search to our files immediately, remove the “View Original File” button and stop facilitating the unauthorized distribution of our Copyrighted work. Anything less is criminal.

Google has become the biggest image scraper of the Millennium

You might wonder why I have used this title but since the 25th of January changes have been made to Google Image Search that have infuriated webmasters, photographers, artists and many more.

From a friend and fellow photographer’s blog: NOT cool, Google!  Google Stealing Online Photos

NOT COOL, GOOGLE. I have no doubt there will be a legal challenge here, as I simply can’t understand the legality of Google itself effectively distributing CONTENT from other people’s websites.

I’m still riled up, I’ve been searching out other blog posts, following a thread that Google started themselves on Google Groups and watching the traffic to my blog and web site drop while seeing the rates of infringement of my images increase. Last week alone I sent in over 100 DMCA takedown requests to Pinterest. That is JUST Pinterest.

WE have to stand up to Google to make this stop.

I said I would be happy to take part in a Class Action suit against Google and due to a recent conversation with an attorney I realize that class action suit is entirely possible and I want to inform as many photographers as I can about it.

I had a very interesting conversation today with attorney William R. Restis of Finkelstein & Krinsk LLP that was very informative about the possibility of a class action law suit against Google with the focus being on the copyright issues that their new image search raises.

What do we need to do to become involved with a class action law suit against Google for the changes they made to their Image Search?

Contact William R. Restis of Finkelstein & Krinsk LLP. This is the same firm that filed a class action law suit against Instagram in December of 2012 for their change in Terms of Service, a suit that forced Instagram to reconsider those changes to their TOS.

I urge you to contact William R. Restis and hear what he has to say.

William R. Restis
Finkelstein & Krinsk LLP
The Koll Center
501 W. Broadway, Suite 1250
San Diego, CA 92101-3579
Email: wrr@classactionlaw.com
TEL:  619.238.1333, Ext. 25
FAX: 619.238.5425

We do have to stand up against Google on this matter to protect our copyrights.

  • Have visits to your site decreased dramatically since Google made the changes to their Image Search?
  • Have you seen a decrease in revenue from ads on your site since Google made the changes to their Image Search?
  • Have you seen an increase in image theft and copyright infringements since Google made the changes to their Image Search?

Please send this URL to other photographers, let’s join together and let Google know we aren’t taking this laying down.

Mia

Facebook Twitter

Is Google’s New Image Search Violating Their Own Policies? The Law?

copyright-notice2

I have been doing more research about Google’s update it its Image Search and have come across a few things that I find of interest. I will be providing links and telling my viewers which paragraphs to look for and adding a short quote from the pages which I believe falls under “Fair Use” since I will not be grabbing the entire content of a page or making screen shots which might be in violation of copyright laws.

Let’s discuss the first question in my title: Is Google’s New Image Search Violating Their Own Policies?

I believe they are, take a look at Google’s Terms of Service for people who have Blogger Blogs on a page called Blogger Content Policy: http://draft.blogger.com/content.g?hl=en

One paragraph on that page; outlining what Google expects from the users of their free blogging platform, stands out in clearly written language.

Copyright: It is our policy to respond to clear notices of alleged copyright infringement. More information about our copyright procedures can be found here. Also, please don’t provide links to sites where your readers can obtain unauthorized downloads of other people’s content.

I made that one sentence red so it would also stand out clearly. So; let me get this straight, according to Google’s terms of service for the people who publish blogs on their Blogger platform tell those users to not provide links where other people can download our content without our authorization.

But Google is providing links to our content and facilitating unauthorized downloads of that content.

Does Google apply or follow the same terms of service to themselves as they do to their users? It sure looks like they don’t, doesn’t it?

I recently discovered one of my juvenile Red-tailed Hawks in flight on a Google Blogger blog, the image was “hot linked” to my web site galleries and I sent in a DMCA Copyright Infringement Notification to Google to have the image hot link removed. This is their reply and response to my notification:

Hello,

Thanks for reaching out to us.

In accordance with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, we have completed processing your infringement notice. We are in the process of disabling access to the content in question at the following URL(s):

http://birdsflyingpictures.blogspot.com/2013/01/mvscience-tailed-hawk.html

The content will be removed shortly.

Please let us know if we can assist you further. If you would like to file additional requests, we ask that you contact us by using the online forms at: www.google.com/support/go/legal as we do not accept add-on requests.

Regards,
The Google Team
I went to the offending URL to make sure that my image was no longer displayed on a Google Blogger Blog and this is what I saw:
page-removed

Not only did they remove the hot link to my image they removed all of the content on that blogger’s post.

But wait; isn’t Google doing the exact same thing this blogger was doing by hot linking to my image files on Google’s new Image Search engine?

Yeah, they are, they are infringing in the SAME manner as the owner of this Google blog had been.

Shame on Google for not following their own terms of service in regards to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, shame, shame, shame.

Next question: Is Google’s New Image Search Violating The Law?

It sure looks that way to me.

Let’s visit the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s pages on Intellectual Property theft and read the statements on their Anti-piracy Warning Seal page: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/white_collar/ipr/download-the-fbis-anti-piracy-warning-seal#unauthorized

Warning language specifying current penalties

  • FBI Anti-Piracy Warning: The unauthorized reproduction or distribution of a copyrighted work is illegal. Criminal copyright infringement, including infringement without monetary gain, is investigated by the FBI and is punishable by up to five years in federal prison and a fine of $250,000.

Okay, see the word “distribution” in the FBI’s warning language?  Google’s update to their Image Search pages DOES distribute our works without our authorization. Is hot linking considered “reproduction” when our images show up full size on their Image Search pages? Well, I sure didn’t authorize them to have my image “reproduced” on their pages. Did you?

This page on the FBI’s website about Intellectual Property Theft is a VERY interesting read regarding Google’s update to their Image Search: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/white_collar/ipr/anti-piracy

Additionally The FBI has a partnership page about Intellectual Property Rights which is also very informative: http://www.iprcenter.gov/

It appears to me that artists, photographers and other content providers whose works show up on Google’s Image Search results have the option of reporting Google to the FBI through their partners at the National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center for Copyright Infringement. http://www.iprcenter.gov/referral

I am seriously considering taking that action, Google isn’t listening to the artists, photographers and other content owner’s feelings on how wrong the changes are to Google’s Image Search, they think they are bigger than we are, but are they bigger and stronger than the FBI and its partners?

I wonder how many complaints through the National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center for Copyright Infringement against Google it would take before the hot linking to our original files would be removed from Google’s update to their Image Search and that “View Original File” button would be removed?

Isn’t what Google is doing Criminal? Sure feels that way to me.

What Google has done isn’t “Fair Use”. If in accordance to the DMCA they have to remove our content that is hot linked on their Blogger blogs then in accordance with the DMCA Google needs to remove the hotlinks on Image Search to our files immediately, remove the “View Original File” button and stop facilitating the unauthorized distribution of our Copyrighted work.

Anything less is criminal.

Mia

See my previous post about this Google issue: Google has become the biggest image scraper of the Millennium

Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer and none of the content above is to be considered legal advice, the opinions are my own and nothing more.

Facebook Twitter

Changes to On The Wing Photography

Antelope Island mountains covered in snow

Antelope Island mountains covered in snow

Because of image theft I have made some changes to my blog, one of the first that will be noticed by people who have subscribed to my blog is that I will only be using a summary for my published posts from now on. The reason for that is that content scrapers can access my images through my RSS feed. It pains me that I feel that I have to do this because there may be some of you who read my posts in your RSS feed rather than on my site.

Another things I have done is removed the link I had up at the top to my Bird and Nature W a l l p a p e r s and I removed those images from my site entirely. What started off as a gift from me to my viewers may have caused the image thieves to find my site and begin lifting my images from it.

I also changed or removed the word w a l l p a p e r everywhere so that the content scrapers don’t pick that up on a Google search. If you have a blog really consider not having the word w a l l p a p e r anywhere on it and don’t use it as a tag or a category.

I found a plugin that can block access to my blog by country and I have blocked a few countries from being able to see my blog because some of the content scrapers live there. It won’t stop all of the pukes that steal images but it will slow down some of them.

I am particularly fed up with w a l l p a p e r sites that steal our images to get money from advertisements that the rotten jerks place on their sites and how difficult it can be to get the images removed.

Seeing how rampant copyright infringement is on the web is disheartening at times. This is one of them.

Mia

Facebook Twitter

Image Thieves – Copyright Violations

A few days ago I was on Facebook and looking at the stream of posts when one of a bird popped up that caught my attention. I knew the bird, I knew the wooden post it was on, I knew the specific location where that bird had been photographed. I was stunned because the image had been altered, a quote had been placed on the image and I knew for a fact that the image did not belong to the person who posted it, I knew exactly who it belonged to and I also knew they did not have permission to use, download, make a derivative work from, reproduce or redistribute the image.

Sure, it wasn’t my image but it made me plenty mad, especially because the image was used on a Facebook page where the person makes a profit from it and was shared with hundreds of individuals.

That person is just one of the thousands of people who steal copyrighted images and that is illegal and in violation of Copyright Laws.

The moment we take an image it is copyrighted and belongs to us, period.

western-tanager-mia-mcpherson-fish-springs-utah-7679coyote-getting-up-6589dsc_3423-baeared-tailed-hawk-juvenile-mia-mcpherson-0679

What do these four images have in common?

Well, they were all taken in Utah, they were all taken by me, they were all posted on either my web site, my blog or a local birding web site. Two were taken in the same county, the other two in two different counties. Three are birds and one is a mammal. I hold the Copyright to all of the images.

What they also have in common is that they were stolen from me, used on a local commercial web site that made (makes) a profit from advertisements used on the web site that was created to drum up business for the owner. The owner of the business did not have MY permission to use the images and they were in violation of Copyright Law.

I was very angry to find that my images had been stolen, even more so because the web site was commercial and they were making financial gains.

I hired a local Intellectual Property Attorney who on my behalf filed suit against the owner of the business and after a few months that business agreed to a settlement, agreed to remove my images and never use them again plus I was compensated for the illegal use of my images.

A few weeks ago I went back to that website to make sure that my images were gone and that they had not stolen any other images of mine and placed them on the site and to my surprise I saw that they had stolen another local photographer’s images and placed THEM on their web site even after having to pay me for the illegal use of my copyrighted images. I contacted the other photographer and let them know that their images had been stolen and was informed that they had not given the company permission to use or license their images either.

Images thieves who should have known better since on their website they claim to be “Copyright experts”. If I had walked into their place of business and stolen their personal property they would have called the police and reported a theft so how can they justify stealing my work?

You might ask how I found the stolen images. I routinely do images Google searches to see where my images are. I check to make sure they are on the server where my web site and blog are hosted or on web sites where I post them to and have authorized image use.

search-pelican-google1

In the Google search screen capture above I used the key words “mia mcpherson pelican” because I had recently seen my images being used without my permission on a site called Fansshare.com, three of my juvenile Brown Pelican images have the Fansshare logo across them, when I ran my cursor over the images it tells me on what website the image is located. Did I give permission to the Fansshare member(s) to use my images and post them on this web site?

No, I did not.

Fansshare.com doesn’t make their TOS (Terms of Service) easily reachable, if you click “register” you see in the registration box “By registering you agree to abide by the Fansshare rules as set out in the terms and conditions”. But guess what? There isn’t a clickable link to those “terms and conditions” that can be viewed PRIOR to becoming a member and as far as I am concerned that should be illegal. Why should anyone agree to terms and conditions when then can not see what they are? That is just plain stupid and stupid isn’t a word I use often.

Fansshare.com does have a page titled Copyright, http://fotos.fansshare.com/network/copyright/#axzz2Cb6DOqmQ that explains how to start the process of a DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright ACT) Takedown Notification to them because they are the “service provider”. If the hosting/service provider does not act on the Copyright Infringement within a reasonable period they can be held liable  for the Copyright Infringement as well.

There are other sites that allow their members to upload images to be displayed on their websites, Pixadaus.com is one of them. Their TOS (Terms of Service) are easily accessible, http://pixdaus.com/pixdaus/help/policy/ and the section that applies to Copyrighted materials is quite easy to understand:

By making Content available, you represent and warrant that:

  1. the downloading, copying and use of the Content will not infringe the proprietary rights, including but not limited to the copyright, patent, trademark or trade secret rights, of any third party;

There are several things about Pixadaus.com that tick me off.

  1. They have advertisements on the site that is generating the owner income.
  2. They have both free and paid memberships
  3. If you are not a paid member you are only able to view 12 images per page and that makes it extremely difficult and time consuming to track down and ascertain IF any of your images are being used illegally and without your permission.
  4. The images are uploaded and stored on the Pixadaus.com servers.

I know my images have been posted to and are showing on Pixadaus.com. What is even more difficult for stolen image location is that when member(s) post new images to Pixadaus.com they are placed at the top of the pages which then pushes older images to the bottom thus if I were to find one of mine today on page one and 15 people post new images to their “tag” section birds it would then be on the THIRD page. A week later it might be on the 25th page.

Does this tick me off? You bet it does and I believe that sites like Pixadaus.com and Fansshare.com should be shut completely down unless they stop giving people who steal our images second, third and more chances. They are making money because of the “draw” that images like mine and thousands of other copyright holder images bring to their websites. Think about it, if they did not have those images on their sites they would go broke.

There are also issues with Flickr.com; a well known photo sharing site, where some members ignore the TOS there. Again, Flickr.com’s TOS are easy to locate, http://www.flickr.com/help/guidelines/ and state those terms in plainly written language:

What not to do

Here’s the deal: We like to give second chances. However, stepping across any of the lines listed below may result in account deletion with or without warning.

  • Don’t upload anything that isn’t yours.
    This includes other people’s photos, video, and/or stuff you’ve copied or collected from around the Internet. Accounts that consist primarily of such collections may be deleted at any time.

Their page for policy on Copyright/IP Infringement is at the bottom of every page, http://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/copyright/en-us/

stolen-black-crowned-night-heron

This is an example that shows one of my stolen images, a Black-crowned Night Heron in flight, that has been illegally used on the Flickr.com site and placed there by a member named [blank].

What ticks me off: 

  1. The page states “This photo belongs to [blank's] photostream” – It does NOT belong to [blank], it belongs to ME
  2. By placing my image on Flickr.com he has violated their terms of service
  3. Also, please note that my stolen image also appears in the Heron Conservation group and they do not have my permission to use the image either.
  4. The page also states © All Rights Reserved and that is horribly misleading, anyone reading this page might think that [blank] owns the copyright when in fact I do.

stolen-chukar

I had a Chukar image stolen and placed on the Flickr.com site and filed a DMCA Takedown Notification through Flickr and once they saw the same image on my own website and ascertained that it does indeed belong to me they removed my image and placed a graphic stating that the image had been “removed due to a claim of copyright / IP infringement”.

Way to go Flickr.com, it shows that the person stole my image.

Flickr.com does state that you can contact the offender by the email icon shown on the member’s page, I do not and will not do that because if that person is showing a pattern of stealing images and placing them on the Flickr site emailing them personally will not be notifying Flickr or making them aware that the member is a repeat offender so I go straight to Flickr.com

Sites that really make me angry? Free W a l l p a p e r sites that steal images from all over the internet and offer them for free download and many of those sites are earning income through advertisements on the pages.

wallpaper-crap

While doing a Google image search on myself or my web site I came across one of those w a l l p a p e r sites, (see image above, a dot com site) and at first located two of my images of a Least Sandpiper and a Western Sandpiper. Did they have my permission to use or redistribute my images?

Hell no.

I did a Whois is Lookup (I’ll get to that later) and found out where the website site was hosted and sent them a DMCA Takedown Notification. While I was waiting to hear back from the hosting provider I did a broader search on the site and found that they had nearly 30 of my images being offered for “free” download. Talk about ticked off.

I also discovered that this website steals bandwidth by hot linking to the images they steal. That can cause a high load on the server that YOU are paying for.

Look above my sandpiper images and notice the “Hot Link” graphic above them. The owner of this website had hot linked to those two images, which presumably were on the owners domain or other location where they had authorized image use. The owner must have spotted the stolen images and replaced them with a “Hot Link” graphic on their own server so that their images do not show on the offending website.

So I sent in another DMCA Takedown Notification to include the newly discovered illegally used and illegally redistributed images.

By the time the hosting provider was able to look at those Takedown Notifications the owner of the website had switched hosting providers so I very quickly got in touch with the new hosting provider, sent in the DMCA Takedown Notification and the owner finally removed all of my images but I decided to keep a close eye on them.

Recently I did a search on the same website for “sandpiper” and did not see any of my images but while going through them I found 2 images of another photographer that I know, contacted him and let him know. He had not given them permission so I explained how to go about writing and sending a DMCA Takedown Notification to the hosting provider.

The owner of this website has NO right to display my images, they do not have a right to offer my images or MY work for free download.

There are many other w a l l p a p e r sites that do this and I believe that every w a l l p a p e r site that does not offer their own “work” (some actually do and are legitimate) and steals other people’s work should be shut down permanently either by their hosting provider or by allowing the Domain Registrar to deny them registration of their domain names for repeated violation of Copyright Laws.

A Whois Lookup:

wallpapercrap-whois01

You can do a Whois Lookup on GoDaddy, NetWork Solutions or any other site that provides domain registration. This is one I did on the website this morning and guess what? They have changed hosting providers since I emailed my friend about his images being stolen two days ago.

The graphic above shows the Current Domain Registrar which is where they purchased the domain name.

wallpapercrap-whois02

This is another part of the results of the Whois Lookup, the current hosting provider is shown at the bottom under “Domain servers listed in order” and that is who needs to be contacted when sending a DMCA Takedown Notification.

It sickens me that there are so many people who think that just because an image is posted on the internet that they are free to use them as they please. Sure, some of it might be ignorance but I bet the biggest part of it isn’t, it is theft.

A few tips on what can be done:

When assigning a file name be sure that your name is in the file name. For instance: red-tailed-hawk-your-name.jpg

Be sure to add your copyright information to the EXIF file of the image.

Use a copyright mark on the image.

Do searches for your images on Google or other search engines, find out where they are located.

Know where you images are posted with permission.

If you find stolen images send a DMCA Takedown Notification to the hosting provider. Be prepared to send a link of where YOUR image is located on your site or other authorized site.

If you find your images on a site that is generating income of any kind, talk to an IP Attorney.

If possible disable “right” click and or imaging dragging on your website. It won’t stop everyone but it can slow theft down.

If you own a website or a blog or both makes sure that every page has a copyright disclaimer on it.

I’m sure there are many more steps that can be taken.

Sites to follow for Copyright Information, both sites discuss how to go about registering your images with the U.S. Copyright Office:

U.S Copyright Office

Photo Attorney - A Photographer who is also a Lawyer. There is great advice and tips on this site and I have added it to my RSS feed so I know when a new post is published there.

There are programs that can be used to search for your images, one of those is TinEye.com, I have never found one of my images though by using it. There are also paid services that add an invisible code to your image so they can be tracked on the internet, Digimarc is one of those. For me though that could be very costly because of the high volume of images I take.

I am not an attorney nor is what I have written here to be construed as legal advice it is my own personal opinion and thoughts. I am a photographer who is really sick and tired of Image Thieves. I am disgusted with people who do not consider that our photographic “work” is valuable and belongs to us. We would not tolerate someone walking into our homes and stealing our personal belongings and we definitely need to stop tolerating Image Thieves!

Mia

 


A sample DMCA Takedown Notification that has worked for me:

 

I am the copyright owner of the [Description or image title] photograph being infringed at:

http://www.url-to-photograph ( use actual link to the image or page on the site that has the stolen image)

Link to the photograph that has been infringed have been included to assist with the removal from the infringing websites.

 

On my website: (place url link to your copy of the stolen image hosted on your web site here)

 

On my blog: (place url link to your copy of the stolen image hosted on your blog here)

On a site where you have authorized image use: (the url link to any site where you have posted the image, for instance Flickr, a blog where you are an author, an image hosting site where you are a member, etc.)

This letter is official notification under the provisions of Section 512(c) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) to effect removal of the above-reported infringements. I request that you immediately issue a cancellation message as specified in RFC 1036 for the specified postings and prevent the infringer, who is identified by its web address, from posting the infringing photographs to your servers in the future. Please be advised that law requires you, as a service provider, to “expeditiously remove or disable access to” the infringing photographs upon receiving this notice. Noncompliance may result in a loss of immunity for liability under the DMCA.

I have a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of here is not authorized by me, the copyright holder, or the law. The information provided here is accurate to the best of my knowledge. I swear under penalty of perjury that I am the copyright holder.

Please send to me; at the address noted below, a prompt response indicating the actions you have taken to resolve this matter.

Sincerely,

Your name
Your email

Your mailing address

Your phone number


After completing the DMCA Take Down letter email it to the abuse or copyright infringement email address on the hosting provider site.
Facebook Twitter